Re: Strange testing migration excuse for xzgv
On 2014-01-02 18:01 +0100, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. (BTW, it was a typo in my original
> message; I had meant to say that the version in _sid_ was 0.9.1-3.)
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:58:12PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Urgencies for new packages are ignored iff they are "higher" than
>> the default urgency configured in britney. The default was recently
>> changed to "medium", meaning that a high or critical urgency package
>> is forced to wait for five days; packages uploaded as "medium" or
>> "low" will migrate after five or 10 days, as appropriate.
Thanks, this is consistent with the information given on the xzgv qa
page ("Too young, only 0 of 5 days old"), but it contradicts what Niels
said in [1]:
,----
| For packages not in testing, the migration delay of 10 days will not
| be changed.
`----
Cheers,
Sven
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/11/msg00007.html
Reply to: