Possible topics for the Lintian BoF at DC11
Hi
I am planning to do this event a bit like the DC10 one, which was
basically pitching or debating ideas. To kick start the event, I have
written a short list (see below) of possible ideas/topics we can debate;
feel free to add more ideas or bring them up on the day.
I have taken the liberty of BCC'ing debian-qa and debian-derivatives on
this email, since some of the recent topics have been debated on these
lists. Please be sure to follow up to the Lintian list.
~Niels
Possible topics (incl. some from last years BoF[1]):
* Lintian "extras" (team/vendor specific checks)
- No official progress
- Vendor profiles can be abused for "adding" extensions
(not "officially" endorsed though)
* Tag (description) translations
* Supporting "Lintian.d.o"-like setups for derivatives/third-parties[2]
- Currently rather inbred code ("it's more awkward than it should
be")
* Lintian Static Analysis Framework[3]
- Expose parts of Lintian as API/Framework for others
(e.g. liblintian-perl)
- Mirror sync support
* Multiple-version/architecture support (#632115 and [4])
- Handling processing of pkg $ver1 and $ver2 at the same time
- Opens the door for limited doing "upgrade" checks.
- Not a replacement piuparts
- Maybe as a separate tool using "liblintian-perl"?
* Maintenance/Attracting more (diverse) developers
- Out-source check maintenance to relevant parties
- (e.g.) Python related checks have been outdated for a while.
- A lot of check/tags use a simple diagnosis
- File X in dir Y requires/implies strong dependency on Z
(checks/files should have a number of examples)
- Write a simple Domain Specific Language for common cases?
* Your idea/proposal here
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2010/08/msg00012.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/07/msg00039.html
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/07/msg00044.html
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/07/msg00112.html
Reply to: