Hi Ralf, thanks for pushing things forward! On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Ralf Treinen wrote: > During FOSDEM we had discussed the planned QA meeting, and in fact we > (Lucas and me) are a bit worried. The reason is that only 1 one of the 4 > planned non-local participants has entered his travel details as demanded. [...] > Personally, I think that if there is a commitment from the planned > participants to work together during that QA meeting then we should > go for it, but this should be discussed and decided now. I'm (quite very much) in favor of having such a meeting in March, cause IMO a dedicated QA meeting is very useful at the beginning of the release-cycle (now is the time to clean up and prepare things...) and also because a QA-meeting at DebConf would more "fragmented" (lots of things happening at the same time, ie I would probably not really attend but being busy with video, etc). I'd like a QA track with a day of taks and discussions at DebConf though. > We see three > alternatives: [...] > What is your opinion? I think we should come to a decision soon, let's > say by one week from now. Basically I already commented on option 1+3 above :-) Option 2, a day meeting doesnt really work for those who have to travel to Paris from further than the subburbs ;) So basically I'm in favor of just doing the meeting as planned. IME even a meeting of just a few dedicated people can make a huuuge impact! And I actually dont think only a few people will attend... For personal reasons I still cannot commit myself to attending. If possible, I'll attend for sure! Lots of stuff to do for piuparts too :-) cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.