Re: suggestion about RFA and O
>> Why not? Giving a link to the PTS in the default RFA/O mail looks
>> reasonable.
>
> Ehm, I don't think so. Otherwise other "reasonable" links can be:
>
> - the bts page for the package
> - the homepage of the upstream project (if present)
> - anything else
>
I think the PTS link will be enough, provide more data and it include
these that you say.
maybe adding the a link to the template, like a RFP that it has a
URL to download web page.
> not strictly related to the current bug report (and the a link to teh
> pts is also on the bug webpage).
>
> The footer is already quite long, I don't want to add stuff to it, in
> particular a link to a page anyone working on a WNPP bug should now.
>
> Anyhow, if you really really think this is of any use, please provide
> a patch to implement it, because given the rate of bugs to reportbug
> is high enough I won't spend time implementing this request.
>
I get it now, but it is free software.
Thanks,
--
Elías Alejandro
Reply to: