On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:09:39AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Just to clarify, I meant moving collab-maint/foo.git to e.g.
> > collab-maint/orphaned/foo.git to make it obvious to folks browsing the
> > repository that it's orphaned, while retaining the history. Not
> > suggesting to put everything under $VCS. Sorry for the bad phrasing.
> Do people actually browse the repository like that? I never do that.
Me neither and I concur that probably nobody does that.
Also, re-thinking at the issue, moving the Git repos around that way,
would make "git pull" on old checkouts fail rather gratuitously.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature