Re: Debconf QA BOF summary / handling of orphaned packages
- To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debconf QA BOF summary / handling of orphaned packages
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:46 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090802125346.GI30815@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20090731201632.GA7218@xanadu.blop.info>
- References: <20090729105354.GA4639@xanadu.blop.info> <4A702F47.106@sapo.pt> <20090730101231.GA14256@xanadu.blop.info> <4A71884B.1020003@beamnet.de> <20090730151606.GA21395@arthur.home.hoaxter.de> <20090731201632.GA7218@xanadu.blop.info>
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> (31/07/2009):
> On 30/07/09 at 17:16 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > IMHO it would be nice to aim at a release without oraphaned packages.
>
> That's totally unrealistic.
Indeed. Quick examples which may come to mind:
- xulrunner and all gecko-based pakages.
- webkit and all depending packages.
Ha!
(Looks like people got interested lately, but you get the idea.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: