Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:08:22 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] g65p97$muh$7@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20080720144542.GR11882@mail-vs.djpig.de> <[🔎] 20080722173430.GG11882@mail-vs.djpig.de> <[🔎] g65dtg$muh$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 200807222246.33499.debian@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] g65o73$muh$6@ger.gmane.org>

Raphael Geissert wrote:
> 
> DFSG:

* Social Contract

>> 4. Our priorities are our users and free software
>> 
>> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
>> community. We will place their interests first in our priorities.

Reply to:

References:
- Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
- Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
  - From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
- Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
  - From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
- Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
Next by Date: Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
Previous by thread: Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
Next by thread: Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread