[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#472432: DDPO: the Uninstallable information lacks explanation and seems to be wrong/desynched



Coin,

Ralf Treinen <treinen@free.fr> writes:

> installable. And that is exactly what edos.debian.net has found. It 
> even tells you the reason:
>
>   libactiveldap-ruby1.8 (= 0.9.0-2) depends on libgettext-ruby1.8
>   {libgettext-ruby1.8 (= 1.90.0-1)} libgettext-ruby1.8 (= 1.90.0-1)
>   depends on irb1.8 {irb1.8 (= 1.8.6.114-2)} irb1.8 (= 1.8.6.114-2)
>   depends on libreadline-ruby1.8 (>= 1.8.6.114-2) {NOT AVAILABLE}

Eidos was not up-to-date at the time i reported the problem, as i looked
for "activeldap" which is the source package name, but also part of all
the binary packages names.

> It also tells you that it is uninstallable since March, 23.

That's an interresting information when crossed refs with upload dates
and changelog, very nice :-).

> Still, I agree that the information on DDPO lacks an explanation.

Probably some sort of recursive report like "why is X not in testing ?"
would help find the root of the problem.


Thanks for your help, dear keysigner ;-).

-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)

Attachment: pgpqd4HFIkFtc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: