debian-qa Jul 2007 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Bug#269493:
Bug#356042:
Bug#357593: Anything new on this issue?
Bug#357593: marked as done (PTS: New package shown as old package)
Bug#373218:
Bug#377282: mail to pkg@PTS not delivered to maintainer by default
Re: Bug#377282: mail to pkg@PTS not delivered to maintainer by default
Bug#380631: closed by Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (Re: Bug#380631: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
Bug#380631: marked as done (do not require approved header for emails to tags)
Bug#381267: qa.debian.org: Confuses NMU/QA and sponsor of NMU/QA
Bug#391816: qa: links to buildd logs should point to build.cgi or pkg.cgi
Bug#392372:
Bug#430143: closed by Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (Re: Bug#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.)
Bug#430143: marked as done (pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.)
Bug#431265: developer.php: watch column outdated
Bug#431305: marked as done (PTS: Testing version in "Available versions" not uptodate)
Bug#431305: PTS: Testing version in "Available versions" not uptodate
Bug#431319: uscan in dehs broken?
Bug#431630: marked as done (packages.qa.d.o: css stylesheet link elements lack required type attribute)
Bug#431630: qa.debian.org: stylesheet link elements lack required type attribute
Bug#431670: marked as done (packages.qa.d.o "patches" link broken)
Bug#431670: packages.qa.d.o "patches" link broken
Bug#431670: Still broken
Bug#432038: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DDPO HTML does not validate)
Bug#432038: qa.debian.org: DDPO HTML does not validate
Re: Bug#432499: libhtml-mason-perl: FTBFS: unmet build dep libapache-request-perl
Re: Bug#432499: libhtml-mason-perl: FTBFS: unmet build dep libapache-request-perl
Bug#432879: Developers pages: general information not updated for a few days
Bug#432879: marked as done (Developers pages: general information not updated for a few days)
Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages
Bug#433095: marked as done (DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages)
Bug#433327: qa.debian.org: Watch Unstable cell does shows outdated info
Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...
Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...
Bug#433511: Fwd: Overview of ddd have dead links
Bug#433894: qa.debian.org: "Updating foo introduces new bugs:" links only to the first link
Bug#433933: should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental
Bug#433963: DDPO: please have an option to hide [RM] packages
Bug#434427: PTS: changelog and copyright links bring to 404 error
computing long-time uninstallable packages
dehs/watch data now update
oops is pretty unmaintained and has RC bug: #406491
Re: [Piuparts-devel] piuparts improvements status
piuparts improvements status
Please rename 'splitter' in hsffig, or ask for package removal.
Processed: Re: Bug#380631 closed by Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (Re: Bug#380631: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
Processed: Re: Bug#431265: developer.php: watch column outdated
Processed: Re: Bug#432038: qa.debian.org: DDPO HTML does not validate
Processed: Re: Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages
Processed: Re: Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...
Processed: Re: Bug#433511: Fwd: Overview of ddd have dead links
Processed: Re: Bug#434427: PTS: changelog and copyright links bring to 404 error
Processed: retitle 431630 to packages.qa.d.o: css stylesheet link elements lack required type attribute
Processed: Still broken
Processed: user qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org, usertagging 433327, merging 433327 431319
Processed: user qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org, usertagging 433963, severity of 433963 is wishlist
Processed (with 2 errors): merging 431265 431319, user qa.debian.org@packages.debian@packages.debian.org, usertagging 431265
QA and Release teams meeting in Extremadura?
Removal suggestion: sanduhr
RM: sanduhr -- RoQA; abandoned upstream, orphaned for over a year
Re: RM: sanduhr -- RoQA; abandoned upstream, orphaned for over a year
Re: Some ideas from the "Supporting 15.000 packages" BoF
The last update was on 18:42 GMT Wed May 01. There are 132 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc