[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#430143: closed by Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> (Re: Bug#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.)



   Wow thanks!!! Its wonderful now! :-)
Just a tought: summary could tell that ATM is used for notifications of progression from unstable to testing, I find that particular option interesting exactly because of that.
   Thanks again!!!
   Goodbye.


El 17/07/07 10:24, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.,
which was filed against the qa.debian.org package.

It has been closed by Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> by replying
to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Asunto:
Re: Bug#430143: pts.cgi: use tooltips to explain what the different checkboxes mean.
De:
Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Fecha:
Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:19:59 +0200
A:
Ivan Baldo <ibaldo@adinet.com.uy>, 430143-done@bugs.debian.org

A:
Ivan Baldo <ibaldo@adinet.com.uy>, 430143-done@bugs.debian.org


On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Ivan Baldo wrote:
Alternatively, this checkboxes could be displayed vertically with a small description at the right:
[ ] bts: Sends all bug reports and discussions.
[ ] bts-control: Notifications about bug reports status changes.

I just did that. It should have been done that way from the beginning...
but you know how lazy programmers are :-)

Cheers,

--
Ivan Baldo - ibaldo@adinet.com.uy - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/
ICQ 10215364 - Phone/FAX (598) (2) 613 3223.
Caldas 1781, Malvin, Montevideo, Uruguay, South America.
We believe that we are free, but in reality we are not! Are we?
Alternatives: ibaldo@codigolibre.net - http://go.to/ibaldo




Reply to: