Re: Bug#404286: O: ldap2dns
On Thursday 04 January 2007 06:28, Igor Stroh wrote:
> I took over ldap2dns just in order to keep it in Debian.
Thanks for doing that.
> I checked the new
> upstream version some time ago but haven't had the time to create a new
> package for it since iirc it didn't work cleanly with my old LDAP records¹
> and I couldn't figure out what the problem was.
> ¹: it wrote the tinydns records just fine, but $? was always 1
I am definitely interested in finding and fixing any backwards-compatibility
problems. I took over maintenance of the software since version 0.3.6 and as
far as I know no incompatible changes have been made at least since then.
Any chance I can get a copy of your LDAP data (or a sample) with which I can
test? I'll take a look at the source and find out what is causing the errant
return code. By chance have you tried any newer versions than 0.3.6?
> I'd say go ahead and take over the package (co-maintainership is fine too),
> but keep in mind, that you'd need to provide an upgrade procedure for
> older versions (see ¹).
Thanks, I'll accept the co-maintainership offer. I'll email you directly in
the future, I think the Debian request can be closed.