Re: Filippo Giunchedi 2006-06-10 <[🔎] 20060610104706.GA7065@esaurito.net> > thanks for the quick reply, is the "package - (short) description" available > somewhere? (okay, this might be another feature for the famous CRMI *g*) Atm it's a big ugly "throw all Packages.gz files at grep-dctrl" which puts the data into a DB file in /org/qa.debian.org/data/ddpo/results. I meant to refactor the stuff there a bit, but as QA still uses CVS, I can't really move binaries and their output around easily. CRMI (or mole, whatever) can be used for that, yes. > how does DDPO cope with libraries descriptions? source package name rarely is > the same as binary, and the -dev package might be the first Binary:, oh well > corner cases. It doesn't. But having a useless (short) description on the -dev package is a bug anyway :) Re: Goswin von Brederlow 2006-06-10 <[🔎] 87zmgl7119.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> > The links to the binary packages should have the short description for > each as tooltip. The source name has the above-mentioned "guessed" name. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature