[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#370087: marked as done (Please include the package description.)



Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:30:30 +0200
with message-id <87bqt2d6bt.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
and subject line Bug#370087: Please include the package description.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: packages.qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org.

MfG
	Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc4-xen
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:

> On Sat, 03 Jun 2006, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: packages.qa.debian.org
>> Severity: wishlist
>> 
>> Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org.
>
> Why? 
>
> IMO it's not necessary:
> 1/ The packages.debian.org link in the title will in 2 clicks bring you to
> the description of the various packages.

Except when the package is less than a week old and packages.d.o
hasn't listed it yet. :(

> 2/ The descriptions are space consuming and do not fit in the PTS which
> gives an overview of the status and provides links to all the more verbose
> content.
>
> Cheers,

Too bad.

MfG
        Goswin

--- End Message ---

Reply to: