Re: Status of apt-listbugs
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:52:43AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> At first I'm bored about the Ruby dependency. I'm not against Ruby but
> I do not want yet another scripting language on a production server.
does that mean you intend to rewrite it in perl or whatever other
scripting language you like to see on a production server?
> Looking at apt-listbugs I would file the following further bug reports
> (and I would do so if I would see a reason to be optimistic that they
> would be solved).
> 1. Strange config file
> Apt-listbugs stores the bugs it just listed in
> This results in a change in /etc after nearly every apt run which
> definitely sucks.
this is against FHS and violates policy. Such information belongs to
/var not /etc. Should be fixed pre sarge or the package removed from