[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: distributed-net-pproxy



* Matthew Palmer [Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:23:17 +1000]:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112.
> > Can we make this happen?  (I'm a little hesitant about the right
> > procedure for these kinds of cases; is it ok for me to simply queue
> > the appropriate bug on ftp.debian.org, or should I ask here first?)

> The procedure I've observed is that someone files a bug on ftp.debian.org
> asking for removal, ftpmasters reassigns the bug to qa.debian.org, and then
> tbm reassigns it back to ftp.debian.org with a rationale.

> The way it's supposed to work (TTBOMK) is that "a QA team member" (however
> exactly that's decided) assigns the bug against ftp.debian.org with a
> rationale and the package quickly goes bye-bye.

> For whatever my opinion's worth, I think it should be flicked, too.  I don't
> think there are too many people keen on doing QA for non-free stuff, and it
> certainly doesn't look like anyone cares about this one.

  There was a little discussion about distributed-net-pproxy last month:

    http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/07/msg00040.html

  To make it easier to sbd. reading the removal bug (CCed), e.g. a
  ftpmaster, this is the link for this second thread:

    http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/08/msg00068.html

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.
                -- Earl Wilson



Reply to: