On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:30:50PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:35:52PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Well almost the only one on debian-java@l.d.o who did not want the dummy > > packages is myself. Personaly I have no problem with removing them but > > lot of other people seems to have. > > I suggest that you split the dummy packages out so they aren't in the > same source as java-common, if java-common is the part you want to see > installed soon. Then deal with the dummy issues later. Ok. One problem though... Some of the fixed bugs are in the dummy packages. But you are probably right I'll make the split. I'll also ask for the removal of the old dummy packages becuase they are buggy and almost useless without the new dummy packages. Regards, // Ola > -- > .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield > : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, > `. `' | Imperial College, > `- -><- | London, UK > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpiVldZsbyVt.pgp
Description: PGP signature