Re: When should the BTS help tag be used?
- To: Debian QA <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: When should the BTS help tag be used?
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:41:34 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021216194134.GB11045@regression.cyrius.com>
- In-reply-to: <20020201142157.GA29550@josefine.at>
- References: <20020111123259.GA7938@hor177046.uea.ac.uk> <20020111200723.180e4168.matthew@bells> <20020112110225.A30482@debian.org> <20020131231725.A31025@fisch.cyrius.com> <20020201142157.GA29550@josefine.at>
* David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at> [2002-02-01 15:21]:
> > This is available on http://qa.debian.org now for bugs tagged help,
> > security and unreproducible. Thanks to Torsten for adding the feature
> > to search for tags (keywords) to the BTS LDAP interface.
> >
> > Anything else we need?
>
> Just a bit brainstorming:
>
> 1) Sortable by age/severity, to help finding packages which should be
> NMU'd
> 2) 'patch'-tagged bugs: Interested parties can try those patches and
> report success/problems. See 1)
> 3) Hide 'upstream' bugs. Supposedly, they are worked on by someone
> outside of Debian.
> 4) View 'upstream' bugs. Check whether they are already fixed upstream.
> 5) BTW why isn't there a 'build' tag? I see quite a few build-related
> help-tagged bugs on bts-help:
We should get http://bugs.qa.d.o soon, hosted on master so we can
access the bug information much better. I guess if we still want the
things listed above, we should file wishlist bugs either on qa.do or
bugs.do (4, for example, looks likes a bugs.do thing to me, for
example).
(Yes, I'm cleaning out my TODO mail folder since we are approaching
the end of the end and since I'm sitting in a train right now.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: