Re: Bug #67746
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 01:36:55PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> 1. I agree the change from CMU to UCD snmp should have been better
> documented. Perhaps the maintainer should have made it more obvious
> by calling the UCD package "ucd-snmp", as he named the source package.
Perhaps. It's been my experience, though, that changing the package
name just upsets a different set of users. In other words, it's a no
win situation.
> Since the maintainer (David Engel) didn't know it was going to be a
> problem, I don't see how he'd do anything different.
Correct. In fact, I didn't think people were using much more than
snmpd.
David
--
David Engel
dlengel@home.com
Reply to: