Re: brief thoughts on org/qa.debian.org
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > * It is not clear in the docs how meta-tasks are added, either
> > technically or procedurally.
> Tasks as meta-tasks are added by the QA committe. If you want to
> contact the technical committee, post here as we are reading this list
> or you can use this alias : firstname.lastname@example.org
Not the techinical committee, but the QA committee. There is significant
BTW could you make another, shorter alias? E.g. email@example.com ?
> > * Is it required that packages actually have their Maintainer reset to
> > QA, or can i just generate a control mail from existing "O" fields?
> What do you mean by « existing "O" fields » ? And what do you want to know
> To orphan a package, you don't need to upload a version with QA as a
> maintainer, you just send the "orphan <package>" ... but your name will
> appear in the page and you will still get bug reports.
I believe netgod was referring to the format of the datafiles used by
the current WNPP software... I think the answer to that one would be
a partial "yes".
> > * Suggested motto: "all free, all good"
> :) It's not really QA related.
Well, it is... maybe this wording would be clearer:
"There's much more than freeness in Debian!"
BTW I think you should make a list of current QA ctte members, and core team
members and put it on a separate page. And BTW I accept your offer for being
in the QA ctte, not only the core team. And again BTW, I'd like if the
e-mail address when referring to me be changed to "firstname.lastname@example.org", not this
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name