Re: A security-base package for Debian
- To: ch@westend.com, Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
- Cc: Brent Fulgham <bfulgham@xpsystems.com>, "Gregory T . Norris" <adric@debian.org>, Peter Tobias <tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de>, Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: A security-base package for Debian
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:54:59 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990713225459.B10946@rising.com.au>
- Mail-followup-to: ch@westend.com, Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>, Brent Fulgham <bfulgham@xpsystems.com>, "Gregory T . Norris" <adric@debian.org>, Peter Tobias <tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de>, Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990712222621.A7669@lathspell.westend.com>; from Christian Hammers on Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 10:26:21PM +0200
- References: <21D757CECBD2D211AD5D00105A2974A73FCF31@EXCHANGE> <19990712192516.T17084@tapiola.infodrom.north.de> <[🔎] 19990712222621.A7669@lathspell.westend.com>
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 10:26:21PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello Maintainers !
>
> Brent Fulgham and Martin Schulze suggested to make a debian security
> package that contains fakebo, snort[1], tcpdump, sniffit etc.
> Conaining means either the packages as IIRC in the net-base package or
> just making a virtual package that has dependencies to all security
> related package.
>
> Up to now the pros:
> + you dont miss a programm
> and the contras:
> - another "virtual" package although it are only four/five packages
> - people only see that there is no sniffit any longer and do not find it
> are in balance for me.
I think that a meta-package depending on these tools would be useful.
I don't think there is an advantage in combining the source packages --
as you said it hides the individual packages like sniffit.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD).
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.
Reply to: