Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group
On Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 02:24:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > * Not so important package - [[things which aren't pri: Standard or
> > above --aj]]
>
> By this definition, anacron fits into this. Or, at least it did while it
> was orphaned.
>
> What packages currently maintained by -qa should be withdrawn? If none,
> do we particularly want to withdraw any, or should we just more or less
> let -qa handle all of them until they're unhappy.
I think that we the current situation is okay, we take enough care
for most orphaned packages (at least those that we know they *are*
orphaned). Maybe I should loosen the wording of that section...
The bigger problem is reassigning all those long-orphaned packages
to QA Group, and getting them in shape. I'll ask netgod (WNPP) to
send us the newest list of his, so we can make a TODO list.
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: