[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian QA Policy Draft

On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > It would be a proper action to write to -devel that package x, y and z
> > > need a new maintainer and people who are interested should speak up.
> > 
> > Yes, but by someone in position and who has every right to do so.
> > I wouldn't like to start pointing out bad maintainers on -devel.
> I'm not talking about bad maintainers but orphaned packages which is
> different.  Ok, one could find out which maintainers were affected
> and compile it into a blacklist, but you can't change that.

It's just that I don't want to participate in that.

>  I also
> don't want to see mails like "Joe Sixpack fails to maintain package xxx
> so we need a new maintainer for it".


> > > The tech committee has a private group debian-ctte-private.
> > 
> > When I became a maintainer I heard only of one private list (which I was
> > subscribed on), debian-private. Why isn't that address written somewhere?
> Because it's new, I don't know it it's used, only half established
> or some such.

Yes, people told me that it is readonly for others?

enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/

Reply to: