[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#24310: marked as done (fvwm2: DestroyMenu some-function-name)



Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:50:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.02.9902030549350.17528-100000@vince>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 1998 15:04:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 20772 invoked from network); 7 Jul 1998 15:04:13 -0000
Received: from lipa.mimuw.edu.pl (mikon@148.81.12.164)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 7 Jul 1998 15:04:13 -0000
Received: (from mikon@localhost)
	by lipa.mimuw.edu.pl (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA23565;
	Tue, 7 Jul 1998 17:03:59 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 17:03:59 +0200
Message-Id: <199807071503.RAA23565@lipa.mimuw.edu.pl>
From: Mikolaj Konarski <mikon@mimuw.edu.pl>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fvwm2: DestroyMenu some-function-name

Package: fvwm2
Version: 2.0.46-BETA-3

In /etc/X11/fvwm2/system.fvwm2rc there is 
  DestroyMenu some-function-name
in some places, instead of DestroyFunction.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux bratek 2.0.33 #1 Tue May 26 15:30:46 CEST 1998 i486 unknown

Versions of the packages fvwm2 depends on:
ii  libc6           2.0.7r-2       The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii  xlib6g          3.3.2.2-1      shared libraries required by X clients
ii  xpm4g           3.4j-0.6       X Pixmap libraries (for libc6) - runtime

-- 
mikon@mimuw.edu.pl
http://zls.mimuw.edu.pl/~mikon/home.html
The one good thing about repeating your mistakes is that you know when
to cringe.


Reply to: