Bug#17667: marked as done (Minor typos in system.fvwm2rc)
Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:50:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.02.9902030549350.17528-100000@vince>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 1998 22:42:12 +0000
Received: (qmail 19730 invoked from network); 30 Jan 1998 22:42:06 -0000
Received: from 209.90.218.1 (HELO spacehead.wwdepot.com) (ghoti@209.90.218.1@209.90.218.1)
by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 30 Jan 1998 22:42:06 -0000
Received: (from ghoti@localhost) by spacehead.wwdepot.com (8.8.5/8.6.10) id RAA03877; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:51:17 -0500
Sender: kirk@ghoti.com
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Minor typos in system.fvwm2rc
From: Kirk Hilliard <kirk@ghoti.com>
Date: 30 Jan 1998 17:12:29 -0500
Message-ID: <87wwfhligi.fsf@ghoti.com>
Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Package: fvwm2
Version: 2.0.46-BETA-2
/etc/X11/fvwm2/system.fvwm2rc contains the lines:
DestroyMenu InitFunction
AddToFunc InitFunction
[snip]
and
DestroyMenu RestartFunction
AddToFunc RestartFunction
[snip]
I assume that in both cases these were meant to be "DestroyFunc".
(Not that it matters if there is no preexisting function of that
name.)
Kirk Hilliard
Reply to: