Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Hamm
\begin{bitch}
jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl in promote-ESR mode writes:
> - gcc 2.8.x .
[...]
> The FSF's gcc development is still very cathedral, so the chances of
> getting bugs we find in it fixed within an acceptable time are small.
[ ...]
> - egcs 1.0.x (which roughly is a further development on top of 2.8.x).
[...]
> It is developed in bazaar-style fashion, with a fast release schedule,
> and very fast snapshot releases. This increases user participation and
> contributes to getting bugs fixed in a timely fashion.
Yet earlier, JHM wrote:
> > egcc 17768 libc6 bug in mathematical functions [114] (Galen Hazelwood <galenh@micron.net>)
>
> Fixing this bug exceeds my capabilities. I have send a message to
> the egcs-bugs list asking them to look into the current reports, but
> have received no responses.
Curious. The much vaunted "bazaar" method failing to deliver any
noticeable gain over the Unspeakably Evil "cathedral"?
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
\end{bitch}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: