[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updating pygccxml



El Dilluns, 12 de setembre de 2016, a les 14:54:50, Mattia Rizzolo va 
escriure:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:43:39PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > with uscan, I have:
> > 
> > uscan --verbose --force-download --repack --compress xz
> > 
> > it's something that I saw in debian science group and I like it
> 
> umh...
> > > The space gain is of
> > > 281160 bytes, hardly something anybody can notice these days (and I
> > > usually prefer to use upstream-provided tarballs).
> > 
> > yes, but we have more than 10K source packages, so ... think that many
> > times we repacked because there are Exclude files in the copyright file.
> I'm not convinced that's an interesting place where to optimize.
> Yes, repacking to remove huge unneded files or non-free files is a good
> cause to repack.  Repacking to save not even 300k, well…
> 
> 
> Anyway, uploaded, enjoy!

thanks!!!!

-- 
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: