[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#427639: netcdfg-dev: why no fortran 90 support via gfortran?

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Matej Vela wrote:

severity 427639 wishlist
close 427639 netcdf/1:3.6.2-1
merge 219592 427639

Giacomo Mulas <gmulas@ca.astro.it> writes:

I had to recompile the package from source to enable fortran90 support via
gfortran, why is it not enabled by default? It only required some trivial
editing of debian/rules to get it to compile on x86_64 (i.e. setting the
fortran90 compiler appropriately).

I believe this is fixed in experimental.  Warren, do you think 1:3.6.2-1
is ready for unstable?

Indeed it's fixed in experimental, I simply downloaded the source package
and it compiled clean and unchanged on etch. I also already compiled and
linked against it a rather demanding quantum chemistry code (octopus) and it
appears to work all right.

Thanks for having fixed this even before asking :)



Giacomo Mulas <gmulas@ca.astro.it>

Str. 54, Loc. Poggio dei Pini * 09012 Capoterra (CA)

Tel. (OAC): +39 070 71180 248     Fax : +39 070 71180 222
Tel. (UNICA): +39 070 675 4916

"When the storms are raging around you, stay right where you are"
                          (Freddy Mercury)

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply to: