[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242117: still not ready?

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > > Let's see what the developers think.  Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > > should we wait until someone adopts it?
> > 
> > #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I
> > checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot
> > _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of
> > testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something
> > along the line of  "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package
> > and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my
> > opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea.
> > 
> > cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before
> > we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough
> > for our users.
> Qingning, you expressed an interest in adopting cabot.  Is this still
> the case?  Would you like to take over upstream maintenance as well?


I am interested in cabot, but I do not seem to have the time to give it
proper care at the moment.  I will set it back to orphan.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: