Bug#242117: still not ready?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > should we wait until someone adopts it?
> #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I
> checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot
> _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of
> testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something
> along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package
> and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my
> opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea.
> cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before
> we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough
> for our users.
Qingning, you expressed an interest in adopting cabot. Is this still
the case? Would you like to take over upstream maintenance as well?