[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242117: still not ready?

Re: Matej Vela in <20050919091008.GI7473@diziet.irb.hr>
> > Hi,
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
> Let's see what the developers think.  Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?

As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves
the same purpose as cabot, is a lot easier to setup and use, and has
the saner address verification "protocol".

I'd opt for removing cabot, but if there's someone to continue
upstream, that's also fine.

cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: