Re: unnecessary adoption by QA-team
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the
maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do*
until the new person actually makes an opload. I am not presently
maintaining the package, and neither are you. QA is the right place for
it to be.
> A ready package, that solve this bug is already available.
> Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload?
Did you even read the changelog at all?
gif2png (2.4.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Orphaning this package.
-- John Goerzen <email@example.com> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:03:42 -0500
See, *I* orphaned it. That is the latest release. Nobody on the QA
team has done a thing with the package.
(BTW, I believe liw may be preparing an upload as well.)
> What are next steps?
> Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build
> a new one?
What QA package?
Debian packages cannot be "reverted". They can only be superceded.