[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

unnecessary adoption by QA-team



Hi!

I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
I'd like to veto here.

I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583

I have package a new version and request an RFS 3 times:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/07/msg00416.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/08/msg00048.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/08/msg00011.html

A ready package, that solve this bug is already available.
Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload?

This means unnecessary work for me to build a new package and double
work on package at all! Are there no more important things to do for
QA-team?
The same was happen on my first package txt2pdbdoc and this sucks.

Or should I post any RFS on QA-list that QA-team get known my work?

What are next steps? 
Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build
a new one?

Regards,
Erik


-- 
 www.ErikSchanze.de *********************************************
 Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB *
      * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004          *
             Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de                 *

Attachment: pgpVzE0BGcnc1.pgp
Description: signature


Reply to: