On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > I'm not sure, but for me the changelog describes the history of the > package and usually I don't change old entries ... but I'm not the > maintainer here, so I guess he'll decide what he want to do. But I agree that a changelog entry must be useful above anything. I propose that it is ammended to show Marillat's full message, not just one of the chunks. That would give enough info. Also, on the changelog of the upload which changes this, mention the change: "Change the changelog in 2.4.2-N to something readable". > BTW in both case, that's a old changelog entry and not a big problem > ... and if the entry is changed, next time somebody will look on curiosa > archives he'll wondering what's happened to this :) I hope these two actions would make it a bit better :) -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jordi@sindominio.net jordi@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature