Re: pyyaml 6

[Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>]

On 2022-10-06 21 h 43, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 00:10 +0200, Gordon Ball wrote:
>
> > * Upload to unstable and see what breaks?
>
> The experimental pseudo-excuses already say several packages break:
>
>     https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=pyyaml
>     
>     autopkgtest for ganeti/3.0.2-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression
>     autopkgtest for llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-7: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression
>     autopkgtest for satpy/0.37.1-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression
>     autopkgtest for spades/3.15.5+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression
>
> So at least these issues need to be investigated and maybe bugs filed.
>
> > * Request an archive rebuild with this version and see what breaks?
>
> Definitely.
>
> > * File bugs against all likely affected packages with a fixed date for
> > an upload?
>
> Definitely.

Shameless plug here, but if you do it in time for the DPT sprint 
(December 2-3-4), fixing packages that broke can even be an agenda item 
people can work on!

https://deb.li/2S8U

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature