Re: Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?
- To: 999415@bugs.debian.org, Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>, debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?
- From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 19:12:18 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] de0c5d4b-8be1-6e77-2e04-e3cd8a49fed6@zoho.com>
- In-reply-to: <5f975766-b826-c686-9a77-88ddbb20a5cd@zoho.com>
- References: <YYv921oVEMm+s0Qm@an3as.eu> <c06879b7-a7a4-61e2-d229-3675f166c9ed@zoho.com> <c06879b7-a7a4-61e2-d229-3675f166c9ed@zoho.com> <CAM8zJQtxWuL1BGrH5xsJPysdhJRt4qNFxQiOQ0a3xW54enNSgg@mail.gmail.com> <d8316dd8-85ac-53f1-fccc-df21a442bbb8@zoho.com> <61874db3-3f9d-cdc6-8acc-821d148d12a6@zoho.com> <1f952bf8-8eb9-e810-5ac9-bd9ba891a170@zoho.com> <5f975766-b826-c686-9a77-88ddbb20a5cd@zoho.com>
After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures
that look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727,
python-skbio #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).
python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail
more tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.
Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half,
against pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422),
would you prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?
Reply to: