Re: Bug#999415: transition: pandas 1.1 -> 1.3 - to unstable now or not?

[Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>]

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:

> After build-testing about half of the reverse dependencies, failures that 
> look new-pandas-related are cfgrib #1000726, joypy #1000727, python-skbio 
> #1000752, and maybe hyperspy (not filed yet).
>
> python-skbio and hyperspy already FTBFS for unrelated reasons (but fail more 
> tests with new pandas), and joypy looks trivially fixable.
>
> Given this and expecting to find a similar number in the other half, against 
> pandas 1.3 working on python3.10 while 1.1 doesn't (#1000422), would you 
> prefer to have pandas 1.3 in unstable now, or not?

My vote would be: go for it, but then again, I don't maintain any of 
pandas BDs.

Thanks,
Scott