Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
On 2021-02-12 10:16, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I mostly agree to add a metapackage. I just don't agree with the choice
> of package name. It makes our user believe that Python isn't "full"
> without it, and they then may install it when they don't need it to
> consume whatever is packaged in Debian. Reality is different.
I agree with your technical point of view. Friends don't let
friends use pip and I banned its use at work.
I don't care about having the package or not and how it were
named, as long as it remains easy to not have it.
Cheers
Reply to: