Re: Policy About Maintainer and Uploaders Fields (was: PAPT: join request)
On 11/11/19 9:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Personally, I've been judicious in putting myself as Maintainer in DPMT and PAPT packages. If we were to ditch the current policy, my immediate response would be to remove DPMT/PAPT from uploaders and maintain them outside the team. It's about 1/4 of my DPMT/PAPT packages.
>
> I suspect I'm not the only one.
>
> Your proposal is not cost free for the teams.
>
> Scott K
Hi Scott,
Exactly what difference would it make? Just that your package would
really appear as not team-maintained, which is already the current plain
reality (as the "unwritten policy" tells nobody else but you can touch
the package). So I don't see why anyone in the team would mind.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: