Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)
On February 9, 2017 10:52:04 AM PST, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> wrote:
>On Feb 07 2017, Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> wrote:
>> On Feb 07, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>>
>>>I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm
>>>with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking
>about
>>>solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit-
>>>maint-merge workflow [1]?
>>
>> As I understand it, there are a few design choices that make dgit
>less
>> desirable for this team.
>
>No. You are confusing dgit with one particular way to use it. You can
>use dgit with the maint-merge workflow mentioned above, you can use
>dgit
>with git-dpm, and you can use dgit with gbp.
OK. So then I gather it's effectively a layer on top of 'normal' things like gbp-pq or git-dpm? What added value would it provide?
Scott K
Reply to: