Re: Moving off of git-dpm (Re: git-dpm breakage src:faker)
On Feb 07 2017, Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> wrote:
> On Feb 07, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>
>>I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm
>>with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking about
>>solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit-
>>maint-merge workflow [1]?
>
> As I understand it, there are a few design choices that make dgit less
> desirable for this team.
No. You are confusing dgit with one particular way to use it. You can
use dgit with the maint-merge workflow mentioned above, you can use dgit
with git-dpm, and you can use dgit with gbp.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
Reply to: