[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Python 4 and ‘python3’



Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> writes:

> AFAIK, there is *no* official declaration (e.g. from Guido or the
> mythical Python 4 release manager) about this either way.

In support of your position, Guido van Rossum has informally implied
version “3.10” is feasible for a future Python 3
<URL:https://twitter.com/gvanrossum/status/583346987925278720>.

I had thought GvR expressed a distaste for Semantic Versioning but can't
find it now.

So, yes, my panic is lessened :-)

> I predict that when the time comes, it'll generate a gigathread's
> worth of discussion, 3 or 4 competing PEPs, and then Guido will just
> pronounce.

Hopefully, informed by reasoned argument about consequences, more than
aesthetic preferences of a small group (I'm still sore about the process
evidenced in the Python VCS decisions, so don't wholly trust this will
be better).

-- 
 \        “With Lisp or Forth, a master programmer has unlimited power |
  `\     and expressiveness. With Python, even a regular guy can reach |
_o__)                               for the stars.” —Raymond Hettinger |
Ben Finney


Reply to: