Hi Tiago, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:19:46PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote: >> - lintian complains about site/js/bootstrap.min.js, AFAIKT the "site" >> folder contains the project's website. Maybe you would like to remove >> it by repacking the source tarball. > > There's a patch[1] adding sources for bootstrap CSS/JS minified files, > but this doesn't makes much sense, right? They aren't included in > binary, nor the orig source tarball. I can repack it as a > DSFG-compatible tarball, but would like to receive a second opinion > about the mentioned patch, confirming if it is really useless. I think it's better to put the missing sources in debian/missing-sources/ directory rather than patching them in. (That is also suggested by the Lintian error description[1], and should make that error disappear.) [1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html >> - It's more accurate to use "Expat" instead of "MIT" in d/copyright. > > I respectfully disagree with you at this point, as I had already > talked about it on "debian-mentors" last month[3]. In this case > there's even an additional detail: the copyrighted files specifically > uses the "MIT" name for the license. Using a different name under > "debian/copyright" would be an inconsistency. According to the copyright format specification[2]: | There are many versions[3] of the MIT license. Please use Expat[4] instead, | when it matches. [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions [4] http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature