Re: Adopting factory-boy
On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>>>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it
>>>>> because there's no reverse dependency for it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for packaging it :)
>>>>
>>>>> If you want to continue maintaining it within the OpenStack PKG team,
>>>>> you can do it as well. Though we're not using git-dpm, and rather a git
>>>>> tag workflow, you're still free to use whatever workflow you want there,
>>>>> as long as the package is well maintained.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you need sponsoring for this package, I can review it and upload it
>>>>> for you.
>>>>
>>>> Great, thanks for the offer. I think I'll have to wait a couple of weeks
>>>> to see where things are for packaging this. There is at least one new
>>>> dependency for the latest release (python-fake-factory), I have packaged
>>>> that, but the tests currently don't pass. Once there is a release for
>>>> python-fake-factory, for which the tests pass, and that has been
>>>> uploaded to Debian, I'll get around to looking at factory-boy again.
>>>
>>> Its been quite a few weeks, but the above is now done. The missing
>>> dependency (python-fake-factory) is now in Debian, and I have updated
>>> factory-boy to the latest upstream version [1].
>>>
>>> Are you still open to sponsoring this zigo? I have just filled in the
>>> alioth form to become a member of the OpenStack team.
>>>
>>> 1: http://git.cbaines.net/factory-boy/
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I added you as a member of the team. Let me know when I should sponsor
>> the package.
>
> Great, I have pushed the changes to the repository and it is ready for
> you to review.
Hi,
Please join #debian-openstack-commits to see the build results.
Currently, the package FTBFS in Jessie's chroot:
https://mitaka-jessie.pkgs.mirantis.com/job/factory-boy/5/console
The type of error you're seeing is most of the time due to the fact you
didn't push the upstream tags to Git.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: