[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Adopting factory-boy



On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it
>>>> because there's no reverse dependency for it.
>>>
>>> Thanks for packaging it :)
>>>
>>>> If you want to continue maintaining it within the OpenStack PKG team,
>>>> you can do it as well. Though we're not using git-dpm, and rather a git
>>>> tag workflow, you're still free to use whatever workflow you want there,
>>>> as long as the package is well maintained.
>>>>
>>>> If you need sponsoring for this package, I can review it and upload it
>>>> for you.
>>>
>>> Great, thanks for the offer. I think I'll have to wait a couple of weeks
>>> to see where things are for packaging this. There is at least one new
>>> dependency for the latest release (python-fake-factory), I have packaged
>>> that, but the tests currently don't pass. Once there is a release for
>>> python-fake-factory, for which the tests pass, and that has been
>>> uploaded to Debian, I'll get around to looking at factory-boy again.
>>
>> Its been quite a few weeks, but the above is now done. The missing
>> dependency (python-fake-factory) is now in Debian, and I have updated
>> factory-boy to the latest upstream version [1].
>>
>> Are you still open to sponsoring this zigo? I have just filled in the
>> alioth form to become a member of the OpenStack team.
>>
>> 1: http://git.cbaines.net/factory-boy/
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I added you as a member of the team. Let me know when I should sponsor
> the package.

Great, I have pushed the changes to the repository and it is ready for
you to review.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: