Re: Packaging review
Hi Ross,
I cannot upload your packages, but I had a quick look at them. They
mostly look good, but there are minor issues:
- Your copyright files don't comply to copyright format 1.0.
- The license description should be indented with a space.
- You shouldn't refer to symlinks like /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
- For GPL license, add a longer introduction (see other packages
for example).
- Please use only one empty line to separate sections in debian/control;
- Some packages have tests, but they are not actually run during build
(like pyinsane).
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Ross Vandegrift <ross@kallisti.us> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on packaging a python application along with its
> dependencies. This is my first shot at official Debian packages, so
> would appreciate any comments on my work!
>
> The modules are in the "debian" branches of:
> python-pocr https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyocr
> python-pyinsane https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyinsane
> python-nltk https://github.com/rvandegrift/nltk
> paperwork https://github.com/rvandegrift/paperwork
>
>
> NLTK already has had some packaging work in progress - I haven't heard
> back from the latest volunteer on it's RFP, so I'm not sure if that's
> something I'd hope to submit.
Reply to: