Re: Packaging review
Also, please run lintian4python to inspect your packages. It reports
some errors, like:
e: python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:62: cmp
e: python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:425: MAX_USERNAME_LEN
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> I cannot upload your packages, but I had a quick look at them. They
> mostly look good, but there are minor issues:
>
> - Your copyright files don't comply to copyright format 1.0.
> - The license description should be indented with a space.
> - You shouldn't refer to symlinks like /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
> - For GPL license, add a longer introduction (see other packages
> for example).
> - Please use only one empty line to separate sections in debian/control;
> - Some packages have tests, but they are not actually run during build
> (like pyinsane).
>
> --
> Dmitry Shachnev
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Ross Vandegrift <ross@kallisti.us> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am working on packaging a python application along with its
>> dependencies. This is my first shot at official Debian packages, so
>> would appreciate any comments on my work!
>>
>> The modules are in the "debian" branches of:
>> python-pocr https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyocr
>> python-pyinsane https://github.com/rvandegrift/pyinsane
>> python-nltk https://github.com/rvandegrift/nltk
>> paperwork https://github.com/rvandegrift/paperwork
>>
>>
>> NLTK already has had some packaging work in progress - I haven't heard
>> back from the latest volunteer on it's RFP, so I'm not sure if that's
>> something I'd hope to submit.
Reply to: