DONE : rdflib 4.0.1-3 arrived in unstable - Was: Re: Preparing for a major update of python-rdflib package
Hi.
Just in case you had missed it, RDFLib 4.0.1-3 just landed in unstable
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rdflib/news/20140513T104042Z.html)
Feel free to test and report breakages.
Latest upstream (4.1.2) should be in experimental in the next days.
Best regards,
Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu> writes:
> Hi.
>
> I'm contacting you as maintainers of reverse dependencies of
> python-rdflib. Maybe some python folks (CC-ed) will be interested too if
> RDF echoes somehow to their ears ;-)
>
> I'm basing this email on my system's testing telling me :
> $ apt-rdepends -r python-rdflib
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> python-rdflib
> Reverse Depends: buxon (0.0.5-4)
> Reverse Depends: python-feedvalidator (0~svn1022-2)
> Reverse Depends: python-sparqlwrapper (1.4.1-2)
> Reverse Depends: swaml (0.1.1-2)
> buxon
> python-feedvalidator
> python-sparqlwrapper
> Reverse Depends: swaml (0.1.1-2)
> swaml
>
>
> I've been working on updating the Debian package of the Python RDFLib
> [0] in recent weeks, improving the work initiated by Christian M. Amsüss
> (see ITA #702300). I've just uploaded an updated package to experimental
> (pending review in the NEW queue [2]).
>
>
> RDFLib 2.4.2 in Debian was really old and buggy for modern RDF
> applications, so I hope the situation will be much better with a much
> more recent version appearing in Debian (4.0.1-1), but I expect quite
> some impact on your packages which still depend on the old version
> (enjoy reading [3]).
>
> I even think this may have a consequence on the presence of some of your
> packages in Debian, which may become obsolete if they can't run with a
> recent RDFLib :-/
>
> Note that for python-sparqlwrapper, I've already tested a bit the
> transition, as both packages are depending on each-other (and the
> appearance of python3-rdflib will make python3-feedparser's transition
> to testing happy ;)
>
>
> I hope the python-rdflib / python3-rdflib packages will appear soon in
> experimental, but in the meantime, they could be tested from rebuilding
> from the package sources (see [1]).
>
>
> Feel free to report and/or ask for more details.
>
>
> Of course more help in improving RDFLib's packaging would be great, and
> I'm sure Christian won't object, as the goal has been to try and do team
> maintenance (even if the Git / SVN issue re. DPMT made it to appear in
> collab-maint for the moment).
>
>
> Looking forward to reading from your bugs,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Obergix
>
>
> [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rdflib.html
> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/rdflib.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/debian
> [2] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/rdflib_4.0.1-1.html
> [3] https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/blob/4.0.1/CHANGELOG.md
--
Olivier BERGER
http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)
Reply to: