Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again
From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:23:49 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 52E67A05.8010804@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140126231411.GC17630@hilbert.home.olasd.eu>
References: <52E35BFE.9090003@debian.org> <[🔎] CAB4XWXxxCGhDXadN9PHj0Sgs3tS0Yw3SNLnLVjD7EzL0cAK2WQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 52E3DA27.2050309@debian.org> <[🔎] CAB4XWXzPzx7pOLaFxG1OxdPKjnXEAHpcooBp9rTyOtdcHvsrvA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 52E4159D.9080505@debian.org> <[🔎] 20140126132438.034d7e61@anarchist> <[🔎] 20140126231411.GC17630@hilbert.home.olasd.eu>

Am 27.01.2014 00:14, schrieb Nicolas Dandrimont:
> - Adding Python 3 support when upstream has it

I think this should make it into the python policy.

  Matthias

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
- Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
  - From: Nicolas Dandrimont <olasd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
Next by Date: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again
Previous by thread: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
Next by thread: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread