Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)

To: Nicolas Dandrimont <olasd@debian.org>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
From: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:32:34 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140127003234.GA12824@leliel.pault.ag>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140126231411.GC17630@hilbert.home.olasd.eu>
References: <52E35BFE.9090003@debian.org> <[🔎] CAB4XWXxxCGhDXadN9PHj0Sgs3tS0Yw3SNLnLVjD7EzL0cAK2WQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 52E3DA27.2050309@debian.org> <[🔎] CAB4XWXzPzx7pOLaFxG1OxdPKjnXEAHpcooBp9rTyOtdcHvsrvA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 52E4159D.9080505@debian.org> <[🔎] 20140126132438.034d7e61@anarchist> <[🔎] 20140126231411.GC17630@hilbert.home.olasd.eu>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:14:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:

[ awesome points here ]

> Cheers,
> Nicolas Dandrimont

Hear, Hear!

Cheers,
 Paul


-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>  |   Proud Debian Developer
: :'  : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'`  http://people.debian.org/~paultag
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
  - From: Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk>

References:
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
  - From: Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
- Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
  - From: Nicolas Dandrimont <olasd@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Set shebang line to default (instead of latest) Python 3 interpreter
Next by Date: Re: Set shebang line to default (instead of latest) Python 3 interpreter
Previous by thread: Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET
Next by thread: Re: Making packaging Python modules fun again (was: Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread