[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFR: python-qrcode -- native python module to generate QR codes



Am 16.02.2013 15:42, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Cornelius Kölbel <cornelius.koelbel@lsexperts.de>, 2013-02-14, 16:53:
>>  http://mentors.debian.net/package/qrcode
>
> Link to .dsc for the lazy:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrcode/qrcode_2.4.2-1.dsc
> (2.4.2-1)
>
> Please drop the preinst script. It's purpose was to clean up after
> python-central in lenny. But this package obvious hasn't been in lenny
> and have never used python-central.
>
> unexporting *FLAGS in d/rules makes little sense, given that this
> package is pure-Python, and therefore isn't affected by any of those.
>
> "pedantic […] error" is an oxymoron… But anyway, I don't see a point
> in mentioning in the changelog that you fixed issues reported, given
> that this is an initial upload.
>
> lintian emits:
> P: python-qrcode: no-upstream-changelog
>
> There's CHANGES.rst, you might want to install it as upstream changelog.
>
> Shipping README.rst is probably a good idea, too.
>
> lintian4python emits:
> w: qrcode source: xs-python-version-current-is-deprecated
> i: qrcode source: python-provides-considered-harmful python-qrcode
> i: qrcode source: python-stdeb-boilerplate debian/rules:3 "This file
> was automatically generated by stdeb 0.6.0"
> w: python-qrcode: xb-python-version-is-deprecated
>
> Please see Developer's References §6.2.3 for guidelines for package
> descriptions.
>
> The manual page leaves a bit to be desired:
> - It doesn't document the --factory option.
> - The manpage title (the first argument to .TH) should be written in
> uppercase; and it should certainly should not be "man".
> - The "COMMON OPTIONS" section should be renamed as "OPTIONS".
> - The "INTERNET SOURCES" section should be probably renamed as "SEE
> ALSO" (but I'm not sure it's worth including it at all).
> - man-pages(7) strongly discourages "AUTHOR(S)" sections.
>
Hello Jakub,

thanks a lot for your feedback. I think I took care of all your comments
- although I was not able to run your lintian4py.
Should I increase the version to 2.4.2-2 or is this version only
increased, _after_ a package is released?

Thanks a lot and kind regards
Cornelius

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: